Yuhasz Body Fat Calculator

✓ Scientific Formula (Yuhasz 1974) ✓ NHL Draft Protocol Available

Enter Skinfold Measurements (mm):

Quick Answer

The Yuhasz calculator determines body fat percentage from skinfold measurements using validated equations for males and females. This method is widely used in athletic assessment, including NHL draft testing.

  • Uses 6-7 skinfold sites for accurate measurement
  • Separate equations for males and females
  • Validated on athletic populations with ±3-4% accuracy

How to Use the Yuhasz Body Fat Calculator

Follow these steps to calculate your body fat percentage using the Yuhasz method:

  1. Select Your Equation - Choose the appropriate formula based on your sex and assessment needs. Males have two options: the standard 6-site equation used in research, or the NHL draft testing equation that includes chest measurement. Females use the standard 6-site equation.
  2. Take Skinfold Measurements - Using skinfold calipers, measure the required sites. All measurements should be taken on the right side of the body. Pinch the skin firmly between thumb and forefinger, pulling it away from the muscle. Place the caliper perpendicular to the fold, approximately 1 cm from the fingers.
  3. Enter Your Data - Input each skinfold measurement in either millimeters (metric) or inches (imperial). The calculator will automatically convert units as needed for the calculation.
  4. Interpret Results - Your body fat percentage will be calculated instantly. Compare your results to athletic standards for your sport and training goals.

Yuhasz Equations

These equations based on the research by Yuhasz give a value for body fat percent from skinfold test results. See more equations for measuring body fat using skinfold measures. All skinfold measurements are in millimeters (mm)

Males (two equations have been found)

Females

  • % Body Fat = (0.1548 x sum of triceps, subscapular, supraspinale, abdominal, thigh, calf) + 3.580, based on a sample of college students.

Understanding Your Yuhasz Results

The Yuhasz method provides an estimate of body fat percentage that can be used to track changes over time and compare to athletic standards. Results should be interpreted in the context of your sport, training phase, and individual goals.

Athletic Body Fat Standards

Different sports require different body composition profiles for optimal performance:

Endurance Athletes

Males: 5-10%, Females: 12-18%
Marathon runners, cyclists, triathletes

Power Athletes

Males: 8-15%, Females: 15-22%
Sprinters, weightlifters, throwers

Team Sports

Males: 10-18%, Females: 18-26%
Hockey, basketball, soccer players

The Science Behind the Yuhasz Method

The Yuhasz equations were developed by M.S. Yuhasz at the University of Western Ontario in 1974. The methodology was validated on college-aged athletic populations and has since become widely adopted in sports science, particularly in professional sports assessment.

The equations use multiple skinfold sites to provide a comprehensive assessment of subcutaneous fat distribution. This multi-site approach improves accuracy compared to single-site measurements and accounts for individual variations in fat storage patterns.

Why Multiple Sites Matter

Athletes store body fat differently based on genetics, training history, and sport-specific adaptations. By measuring multiple sites, the Yuhasz method captures a more complete picture of body composition. The inclusion of both upper body (triceps, subscapular) and lower body (thigh, calf) measurements ensures representation of total body fat distribution.

NHL Draft Testing Protocol

The National Hockey League uses a modified Yuhasz equation as part of their draft combine testing. This variation includes chest measurement and uses slightly different coefficients, reflecting the specific body composition requirements of hockey players.

Hockey players typically maintain body fat percentages between 8-12% during the competitive season. The sport demands a balance between power for shooting and checking, endurance for long shifts, and agility for skating performance. The NHL equation accounts for these sport-specific requirements.

Factors Affecting Accuracy

Several factors can influence the accuracy of skinfold measurements and the resulting body fat calculation:

  • Measurement Technique - Consistency in pinching technique, caliper placement, and reading timing is crucial. The same trained technician should perform all measurements when tracking changes over time.
  • Hydration Status - Dehydration can compress skinfolds, leading to underestimation of body fat. Athletes should maintain normal hydration for accurate measurements.
  • Training Status - Recent intense training can cause temporary fluid shifts and muscle swelling, affecting skinfold thickness. Measure at least 24 hours after intense exercise.
  • Time of Day - Skinfolds can vary slightly throughout the day due to fluid shifts. Perform measurements at the same time of day for consistency.
  • Caliper Quality - Professional-grade calipers with consistent spring tension provide more reliable measurements than low-quality alternatives.

Improving Your Body Composition

If your results indicate room for improvement in body composition, consider these evidence-based strategies:

For Reducing Body Fat

  • Progressive Caloric Deficit - Create a moderate deficit of 300-500 calories per day through combined diet and exercise modifications.
  • Maintain Protein Intake - Consume 1.6-2.2g protein per kg body weight to preserve lean muscle during fat loss.
  • Incorporate Resistance Training - Maintain or build muscle mass with 3-4 strength training sessions per week.
  • Strategic Cardio - Include both steady-state and interval training for optimal fat oxidation.

For Athletic Performance

  • Sport-Specific Goals - Target body fat levels appropriate for your sport and position requirements.
  • Periodized Nutrition - Adjust intake based on training phase, with higher calories during building phases.
  • Recovery Focus - Prioritize sleep (7-9 hours) and stress management for optimal body composition changes.
  • Regular Monitoring - Track progress every 4-6 weeks using the same measurement protocol.

Frequently Asked Questions

How accurate is the Yuhasz body fat calculator?

The Yuhasz equations provide estimates within ±3-4% accuracy for most athletic populations. The method was validated on college students and is widely used in professional sports, including NHL draft testing. Accuracy depends on proper measurement technique and consistency.

Which Yuhasz equation should I use?

For males, use equation 1 for general athletic assessment (6 sites including calf) or equation 2 for the NHL draft protocol (6 sites including chest). Females should use the female-specific equation with 6 sites. Choose based on your sport requirements and available measurement sites.

How often should I measure my body fat with this method?

For tracking progress, measure every 4-6 weeks using the same equation, technique, and ideally the same technician. More frequent measurements may not show meaningful changes and can be affected by daily fluctuations in hydration and training status.

What's a good body fat percentage for athletes?

Optimal body fat varies by sport: endurance athletes typically range 5-10% (males) or 12-18% (females), power athletes 8-15% (males) or 15-22% (females), and team sport athletes 10-18% (males) or 18-26% (females). Individual variations exist based on position and performance requirements.

Can I use this calculator if I'm not an athlete?

Yes, the Yuhasz method can be used for general fitness assessment, though it was originally validated on college-aged athletic populations. For general fitness, males typically range 15-20% and females 22-30% body fat. The calculator provides context for both athletic and general populations.

Why does the NHL use a different Yuhasz equation?

The NHL draft testing protocol uses a modified equation that includes chest measurement and different coefficients, specifically calibrated for hockey players' body composition patterns. This reflects the unique physical demands of hockey, including upper body strength requirements for checking and shooting.

References

  1. Yuhasz, M.S. (1974). "Physical Fitness Manual." University of Western Ontario, London Ontario.
  2. Carter, J.E.L. & Heath, B.H. (1990). "Somatotyping: Development and Applications." Cambridge University Press.
  3. Heyward, V.H. & Wagner, D.R. (2004). "Applied Body Composition Assessment." Human Kinetics, 2nd Edition.
  4. Norton, K. & Olds, T. (2004). "Anthropometrica: A Textbook of Body Measurement for Sports and Health Courses." UNSW Press.
  5. Ackland, T.R., et al. (2012). "Current Status of Body Composition Assessment in Sport." Sports Medicine, 42(3), 227-249.
  6. NHL Central Scouting. (2023). "NHL Combine Testing Protocols." National Hockey League Official Documentation.
  7. Meyer, N.L., et al. (2013). "Body Composition for Health and Performance." International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 23(2), 109-113.
  8. Kasper, A.M., et al. (2021). "Come Back Skinfolds, All Is Forgiven." Journal of Sports Sciences, 39(10), 1093-1101.

Related Pages

Other Body Fat Equations

Compare different methods for calculating body fat from skinfolds

View Equations →

Body Fat Norms

Reference values for athletes and general population

View Norms →

Skinfold Measurement Guide

Detailed instructions for taking accurate skinfold measurements

Learn More →

Body Composition Tests

Complete list of methods for assessing body composition

Explore Tests →

send us a comment Any comments, suggestions, or corrections? Please let us know.

Testing Extra

We have over 400 fitness tests listed, so it's not easy to choose the best one to use. You should consider the validity, reliability, costs and ease of use for each test. Use our testing guide to conducting, recording, and interpreting fitness tests. Any questions, please ask or search for your answer.

Advertisement Disclosure

Topendsports.com features links to partner sportsbooks. If you click on these affiliate links and create an account or deposit funds, we may receive a commission at no extra cost to you. While partnerships may affect which brands are featured or their position in some lists, all reviews and ratings are based on independent analysis and remain entirely unbiased.

 → How to Cite